View Full Version : Has anyone ever tried..


andrew h
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 10:34 AM
Have anybody ever tried the Ultimate diet 2.0 by Lyle mcDonald? If you have, what were your results?

I am in the first week and have lost 2 lbs. That is after yesterday I ate 6,500 calories! I think I am going to start a journal so I can track my progress for the next couple weeks.

Sole
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 02:19 PM
I haven't, but I've heard of many people who have and reported great results. Keep and journal and keep us posted...I'll be interested to follow your progress.

1FastGTX
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 02:23 PM
I have not tried it but I too have heard a lot about it.

I'll be interested in seeing your progress if you have time to make updates every once in a while! :tucool:

Skoorb
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 03:21 PM
It's an annoying thing to deliberately avoid putting in a thread's proper subject to encourage people to enter a thread.

bradh
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 04:32 PM
Have anybody ever tried the Ultimate diet 2.0 by Lyle mcDonald? If you have, what were your results?

I am in the first week and have lost 2 lbs. That is after yesterday I ate 6,500 calories! I think I am going to start a journal so I can track my progress for the next couple weeks.

Was 6500cals part of the meal plan?

betastas
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 04:36 PM
It's an annoying thing to deliberately avoid putting in a thread's proper subject to encourage people to enter a thread.

Seconded. Please read the forum policies, and don't do it again.
It's just courtesy to spare people the time of reading non-applicable threads and to save on bandwidth costs.

COBound158
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 04:38 PM
Was 6500cals part of the meal plan?

If I remember correctly, the Ultimate Diet 2.0 incorporates an extremely low calorie diet for 5 or 6 days of the week (with low carbs I think), and then it has you carb and calorie load for 1 or two days. Its sort of like the CKD only the calories go really low (maybe 1200).

I read it a while ago, so I could be wrong.

andrew h
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 07:10 PM
I just started a journal so I'll try to keep that updated. I plan to go for a total of 8 weeks, so 7 more left.

sorry about the thread title, i didn't know it would be a problem with people.

bradh
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 07:14 PM
If I remember correctly, the Ultimate Diet 2.0 incorporates an extremely low calorie diet for 5 or 6 days of the week (with low carbs I think), and then it has you carb and calorie load for 1 or two days. Its sort of like the CKD only the calories go really low (maybe 1200).

I read it a while ago, so I could be wrong.

I done a quick search after i posted the question - its seems its not public info IE you have to pay for it.

Guys, what's the beef with the title? Bandwidth issues? Am i missing something here? :doh:

COBound158
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 07:27 PM
I done a quick search after i posted the question - its seems its not public info IE you have to pay for it.


Does that mean we can't talk about it?

bradh
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 08:01 PM
Does that mean we can't talk about it?

Be quiet :nope: the internet cops will come. :lol:

No idea dude how that works. :)

betastas
Sat, April 29th, 2006, 08:38 PM
I done a quick search after i posted the question - its seems its not public info IE you have to pay for it.

Guys, what's the beef with the title? Bandwidth issues? Am i missing something here? :doh:


Titles are supposed to be descriptive so that people don't have to click on them to find out what is in it. When you have a forum full of titles that don't have information in them, you can go through three or four more threads than you need to to find anything relevant to you. On JSF the forum is small enough that it may not be a big deal. On a larger forum, it can make up a significant portion of the bandwidth - People loading pages that they don't care to see, but don't know it because the title is misleading. It is particularly bad if there is an image hosted in the thread.

I was just pointing out that the title should be descriptive as a point of courtesy primarily, and a consideration to the webmaster secondly. A better name would have been "Lyle's Ultimate Diet 2.0 Results?". I don't really want this to get nitpicky, I was just hoping to inform the OP that the thread title should be descriptive for both the forum users and owners.

:D (I realize the irony in posting about saving bandwidth)

andrew h
Sun, April 30th, 2006, 03:38 PM
I done a quick search after i posted the question - its seems its not public info IE you have to pay for it.


The ultimate diet 2 is in book form. I think its available in pdf format also. This is the description I got off the bodyrecompositon forums

"Ultimate diet 2 (UD2): a complicated cyclical ketogenic diet involving 4.5 days of dieting with a 2.5 day anabolic phase. Only for males below 15% bodyfat and females below about 24%."

my first week has been pretty good, I've had trouble sticking with complicated plans before, so I really want to push through and see what kind of results I can get with this. hopefully I can stay with it.

bradh
Sun, April 30th, 2006, 11:51 PM
:D
(I realize the irony in posting about saving bandwidth)

:lol:

sabre
Mon, May 1st, 2006, 10:34 AM
If you hover the mouse over the title you can read the first few lines. So you can come in or not after that.

andrew h
Mon, May 1st, 2006, 03:52 PM
i lost almost 5lbs this week and 1 in off the waist line. Not bad at all!

Timbermiko
Tue, May 2nd, 2006, 01:56 AM
Keep us posted....Lyle sure knows his stuff:tu: