mrgrieves
Sun, January 29th, 2006, 09:47 AM
Throughout my adult life, I have been an on again off again exerciser. I'll work out consistently for 6 weeks and then not go back to the gym for 4-5 months. But I've been going pretty good and consistent since November and I hope that this is the time that I stay on track.
I've been doing full body 3x week and do cardio when I can. If I lift on Monday, but don't make it to the gym to do cardio on Tues, I'll lift on Weds and never make up that cardio session.
My question is whether it is better to keep doing the full body until I'm stronger and more advanced or if I should start doing a split routine. I note that John Stone started off with a split routine.
I work out in the morning before work and before my kids wake up. So, my work out time is limited. I have to be out of the gym by 6:45 to be home by 7. When I do a full body work out, I don't have time to finish up with a little cardio. I figured with a split, I'll be doing less sets which would leave more time for cardio. But I'm worried that if I miss a lifting workout on a split, certain muscle groups may go longer without a workout. Currently, I'm not having a problem doing the full body 3x week, but sometimes have had problems due to work and family getting to the gym 4-5 x week.
I'm 6' and a soft 195 lbs. My goals are to get firmer, stronger, and look better. Weight is just a number, so I'm not too concerned with that. I still need to figure out my bf% as that will probably be a better way to chart my progress (if any). Another goal is to do a set of unassisted pull ups by summer.
I know that I need to incorporate more cardio to achieve my goals, but I prefer lifting to getting on the treadmill.
So, back to my point: should a relative beginner attempt a split routine? Or is a full body more preferable?
:guitar:
I've been doing full body 3x week and do cardio when I can. If I lift on Monday, but don't make it to the gym to do cardio on Tues, I'll lift on Weds and never make up that cardio session.
My question is whether it is better to keep doing the full body until I'm stronger and more advanced or if I should start doing a split routine. I note that John Stone started off with a split routine.
I work out in the morning before work and before my kids wake up. So, my work out time is limited. I have to be out of the gym by 6:45 to be home by 7. When I do a full body work out, I don't have time to finish up with a little cardio. I figured with a split, I'll be doing less sets which would leave more time for cardio. But I'm worried that if I miss a lifting workout on a split, certain muscle groups may go longer without a workout. Currently, I'm not having a problem doing the full body 3x week, but sometimes have had problems due to work and family getting to the gym 4-5 x week.
I'm 6' and a soft 195 lbs. My goals are to get firmer, stronger, and look better. Weight is just a number, so I'm not too concerned with that. I still need to figure out my bf% as that will probably be a better way to chart my progress (if any). Another goal is to do a set of unassisted pull ups by summer.
I know that I need to incorporate more cardio to achieve my goals, but I prefer lifting to getting on the treadmill.
So, back to my point: should a relative beginner attempt a split routine? Or is a full body more preferable?
:guitar: