Just for fun guys/gals, what's the size of jeans, shorts, trousers, pants you're currently wearing?

Me, currently my jeans are extreme low waist, overhauled (whatever that means) size 34. It's a bit loose, but just the way I like it! I wouldn't call it my waist though, because I'm wearing it at my hips, just bellow my pelvic bones. :lol:

Just for fun guys/gals, what's the size of jeans, shorts, trousers, pants you're currently wearing?

Me, currently my jeans are extreme low waist, overhauled (whatever that means) size 34. It's a bit loose, but just the way I like it! I wouldn't call it my waist though, because I'm wearing it at my hips, just bellow my pelvic bones. :lol:
Anything very loose or baggy I can get away with 28 or 29's depending on the brand, but I stick to 30 because I just have this very silly complex that a man shouldn't wear pants sizes in the 20's

If the jeans are more standard or boot fit, I have to go with 31 because of my big thighs, and as to form fitting or slim fits, I avoid like the plague because there is no way in hell i'm fitting into one of those comfortably, infact I probably wouldn't even be able to sit down :p

36x36 sounds big but im very tall and have wide hips. same size since i left high school ten years ago.

42/40...some are 42, some are 40...but aint it great when they start getting loose :)

31" - but i change the "1" into a "0" with a black pen.

I'm at 30 from a 36-38. Tried 29 (and could wear them) but they didn't fit in the legs at all. I've got fairly large thighs.

33x32 is what I usually try on when I first spot a pair I like. Works for both cut and bulk seasons as when fully cut my waist is about 31, but at the end of a bulk its closer to 34.

The variance between brands is crazy though, and the actual measurement is always bigger than what the tag lists. That's obese American for ya.

31" - but i change the "1" into a "0" with a black pen.

your kidding right.

Seinfeld joke...

28 :nod:

34 down from a high of 42

30, but they fall off of my butt. My pair of 34's used to be tight. :)

32x34

Hungh?

Clothing size has got to be the most inconsistent measurement around, even within brand. For example with Levis 569s I would wear a 30 but with Levis 560s I wear a 32. Slacks are typically 32 or 34 depending on brand.

I was a 34x34, but I am currently wearing 32x34. The strange thing is that the 32x34's seem longer than the 34x34's.

Anything very loose or baggy I can get away with 28 or 29's depending on the brand, but I stick to 30 because I just have this very silly complex that a man shouldn't wear pants sizes in the 20's
Hmm... something to think about... :lol:

Being a 'fashionable' college male, all pants need to be a little looser and lower on the waist, though I tend to keep mine within reason. I havent bought pants in a while due to being short on money, but i've always been between a 30 and 32, but opt for the 32 for comfort. It's kinda hard to find a 32 X 30 sometimes, always making it hard on the short guy...

Clothing size has got to be the most inconsistent measurement around, even within brand.

Agreed - I wear anything from a 32 to 34 these days.

I wear anywhere from 32 to 34 waist, but I'm most comfortable in 33 with a 30 length. Most of my jeans are Carhartt and I find the canvas (new style) fit funny compared to the regular and stonewashed. I don't know why they changed the style. The new style seems like it's made for a thin waisted tall person becuase the waist sits up around the navel and the crotch is very long. The regular style fit almost like Levi's or most other jeans.
Anyway that's my opinion for what it's worth.

Leftyx (Jordan)